|
        

|
|
Industrial relations report,
1999
In 1999 Alphametrics won a contract with the European Commission to help produce an
important new report on Industrial relations in the Union. The role of our team was to help identify relevant statistical material, to
analyse this and to present the results in a visual form.
The report was published at the beginning of 2000 and
highlights the diversity of arrangements governing "work"
in the Union, as well as the main forces and
trends which are evident. It also looks at the potential impact of enlargement and allays some of the fears of large
scale job losses as countries with low labour costs accede to the Union.
- Analysis
of working time
- The report examines the development of working time, not
only the total hours worked, but the way in which these are distributed between those
working part-time or at the weekend. The reasons underlying the decline in average weekly
working hours are also analysed - with increased part-time employment and changing
sectoral composition seen as the main explanatory factors, rather than any genuine fall in
hours among those working full-time.
-
- Macro-economic
background
- The underlying macro-economic forces that have shaped the
labour market over the last 20 years are analysed in detail, with particular emphasis on
the interaction between wages and productivity. Comparable data for the US and Japan are
also presented, indicating that in the early 1990s unit labour costs in the Union fell
below those in the US, whereas they had historically been higher.
-
- Enlargement
of the Union
- A section on enlargement of the Union suggests that,
although labour costs in the CEECs are only a fraction of those in most Member States,
fears of large-scale job losses upon their accession to the Union are unfounded. The
reason is that their wages are broadly in line with productivity, so that there is little
difference in unit labour costs. It is also pointed out that the Union has a trade surplus
with the accession countries, rather than a deficit.
|